Menu
 
Research menu
Jump to menu

Publications:  Prof David Musker

Musker D(2017). ‘Making citations’—mystery or mistranslation? The Opinion of Advocate General Bot in Nintendo v BigBen. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
10.1093/jiplp/jpx151
https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/27883
MUSKER DC(2017). The Wisdom of the Crowd(ed Art): Difference, Density and Saturation in European Union Design Law. 20 years of the Boards of Appeal at EUIPO, Anniversary Book, Celebrating the Past, Looking Forward to the Future, EUIPO (Alicante, Spain),
https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/28768
MUSKER DC(2015). Industrial Design Rights: United Kingdom. Industrial Design Rights An International Perspective,
Musker D(2014). Design crime: back to the future or forwards to the past?. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice vol. 9, (12) 976-985.
10.1093/jiplp/jpu163
MUSKER DC(2012). The Overlap between Patent and Design Protection. Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights, OUP Oxford
MUSKER DC(2011). Chapters on substantive RCD law. Concise European Trade Mark and Design Law, Kluwer Law International
Musker D(2010). IP attorney litigators: will they fly or die?. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice vol. 5, (8) 602-607.
10.1093/jiplp/jpq069
Musker DC(2009). A fine job ... Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice vol. 4, (2) 137-138.
10.1093/jiplp/jpn245
Musker D(2007). The great free beer debate or, what ales the patent system?. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice vol. 2, (12) 799-804.
10.1093/jiplp/jpm186
MUSKER DC(2003). Hidden Meaning? UK Perspectives on" Invisible in Use" Designs. European Intellectual Property Review vol. 2003, (10) 450-450.
Musker DC(2002). Community Design Law Principles and Practice.
Musker DC(2000). CIPA Guide to the Patents Acts. IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT LAW vol. 31, (1) 116-117.
Musker DC(1998). The European patent convention: Revised English edition. IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT LAW vol. 29, (1) 120-122.
Return to top